Posts Tagged ‘errata’
CORAL Errata: BANNED! – Missing Image Credits
We regret to have discovered that we failed to include photographer credits on two images that appeared in CORAL Magazine’s July/August 2014 issue.
CORAL Magazine Errata: May/June 2014
We discovered two spelling errors in captions we wish to correct.
Event Correction – CAOAC Convention 2014 is in Toronto, Ontario, Canada
The correct location for the 2014 CAOAC Convention is Toronto, not Calgary.
CORAL Errata – Heniochus diphreutes misspelling
We recently misspelled the scientific name for the Schooling Bannerfish – we regret the error.
Captive breeding 2014 Errata
In the haste to get the Jan/Feb 2014 Issue of CORAL to the printer before the holidays, we caught an error in Tal Sweet’s Captive Breeding: State of the Art 2014 report. However, it appears the error was not corrected in the version sent to the printer.
Sandhi 善迪 says:
Amazing spot. I love this part of knowledge: "Every small, free square inch is quickly occupied by Xeniidae corals. But, they seem to serve a very important function, preparing the substrate, and binding every piece of coral rubble together so sponges and coralline algae can finish the job by cementing everything up. Thus, later, coral larvae can settle on this newly stabilized real estate." Thank you, VincentNew Ocean-Inspired Designs from Walt Smith says:
[…] over 5 years ago, at the tail end of 2017, Fiji’s government unilaterally banned coral exports, leaving WSI with nothing more than fish and invertebrates to send to customers around the globe. […]CORAL New Issue “FREE THE FISHES” Inside Look says:
[…] of Contents for the May/June 2023 issue of CORAL Magazine. You can view this TOC online. “Is keeping a marine aquarium morally right? Is it ethically correct? Is it something we can […]Jon Gordon says:
Please sign this to support common sense rules in Florida. Ask Fish and Wildlife not to use an ill-advised whitelist of animals that can be kept. All you need to do is add your name to the following statement, "A viable option I support would be a list of prohibited species, which would be a much smaller, manageable and enforceable list than one that attempts to encompass all allowed species. " https://petadvocacy.org/advocacy-campaigns?vvsrc=%2FPetitions%2F3902%2FRespondBryce David says:
To whom it may concern, A whitelist approach to regulating which species are legally allowed to be obtained and traded will decimate fish farms and pet stores. This is not a well thought out approach for combating invasive species release into ecosystems. Best Management Practices have already made inroads on preventing the release of foreign invader species. I suggest a review of those practices and amend them if they are deemed to be insufficient. Sincerely, Bryce DavidEdward Moats says:
I urge you to consider the ramifications of losing a 172 million dollar industry in your state. I completely support the black list and agree that invasive species is a big concern. However , I feel that this bill is over reaching and will have a negative impact not only On the industry , but to Florida’s economy.